J estem anti-Semite. So, what is it trza fingers point out, denounce and contemptuous Quito swelling of the lips.
mean - come back! I'm anti-Semitic according to the definition of Polish-Jewish dialogue coined by some circles. Just like with the new definition of tolerance, understood as the obligation to accept everything, and dialogue so lived to see the new progressive, modern, and not one that took the ciemnogrodu significance.
D ialog, I ask Mr. and Mrs., such cus that nothing in the world do not try to understand the other side. Understanding it requires self-reflection and ability to confront their own values \u200b\u200bto these new and difficult. What's more (and horror) forces to ask questions, often not very comfortable. And this, adopted in accordance with the above tolerance - is now neither misses an attack on the right to have their own identity and views (a subtle distinction, however, eludes the right to hold opinions and duty, if need be, to defend them.)
After kiego therefore ask questions and ponder, if you can go the other way.
D ialog therefore it is not an effort to understand the other side, but crude and uncritical take her point of view. In the case of Polish-Jewish dialogue - fans of the question that way, they become more Jewish than the Jews themselves and understand the dialogue itself as a machine for processing claims, rather than seeking common ground. The dialogue, which is based on reciprocity, it does not have much in common.
was illustrated in the recent interview with Peter Pacewicz Polish chief rabbi, "Rabbi looks at Christmas"
P acewiczowi, despite strenuous efforts, failed to convince the rabbi, which is anti-Semitic swamp he lived. He failed also to provoke him to criticism of Catholicism, which inevitably połechtałoby open to dialogue and tolerant heart your editor.
Well, let's see how is the idea of \u200b\u200bPolish-Jewish dialogue in practice:
How it feels to be a rabbi in the country where it is still a strong anti-Semitism?
A no - corresponds to the rabbi - Poland is not anti-Semitic country is a lie. The problem is, but he is not as demonized. This obviously had to confuse the editor Pacewicz, because on a good day did not gain applause. However, wades further tirelessly:
But someone in another country would defile the memory of victims of Auschwitz million, stealing the inscription "Arbeit macht frei"?
About dpowiedź rabbi is charmingly and disarmingly logical - not because the inscription was hung at Auschwitz, and it should operate in Poland. And when it comes to anti-Semitic motives behind the theft - it's do not know about, and too early for courts. And again the cheek. Noteworthy is shocking intellectual argument of Mr. Editor, that string in another country would not have been stolen, because certainly in other countries, anti-Semitism does not exist, or men of anti-Semites are more tactful:) We know - it's just as anti-Semitism in Poland (although, out of spite, however, the client was a foreigner) is interesting - officiousness Pacewicz imperceptibly entering the mainstream of Jewish radicalism, is, in fact in suggesting that either the victims of Auschwitz were only the Jews, or theft of another fallen nacjom not defiled the memory (probably because they were not counted.)
In 2006 he attacked the young man, Mr. Rabbi. He shouted "Poland for Poles", hit you and has been broken in the face of gas. I remember when I called asking for a comment to "Gazeta, embarrassed, full of national guilt. And you shouted into the phone: "What is anti-Semitism?" It was tough. " I started to tell you how he wanted to catch him to give back.
A s editor-in-your sleeve - this time he did not have a rabbi eversion and will have to admit that Poles are anti-Semites. Again, disappointment, Rabbi sums it up with laughter and denial of anti-Semitic Polish ciągotkach. Also moved by his sensitivity to the editor Pacewicz valiant, heroic attitude, which makes him suffer and beat his chest for the millions of anti-Semitic Poles. Lad! Lad!
Is it a profound conviction of Mr. rabbi, or rather a ploy by praising the Poles, effectively breaking stereotypes?
R edaktorowi Pacewiczowi in the head does not fit, that a Jew could not accept the thesis of the Poles, anti-Semites. Poland Poland is anti-Semitic, so if it is a dogma that does not require defense (Let anyone dare to violate its holiness!), thus praising the Poles a clever tactic. A rabbi secretly knows what it knows Pacewicz editor - that Poles are anti-Semites anyway.
No, but if the living did not succeed, trza focus on inanimate matter:
Apparently it is a lot of problems, local authorities are able to destroy the cemetery (Jewish - perm. Mine), building water supply system.
I profession again, our indefatigable rabbi responsible briefly true. As you can see - journalist's life is sometimes the same humiliation band:)
No portion of anti-clericalism and became (by the way Poland is a strange country - can not be anti-Semitic, and being anticlerical a reason to glory):
John Paul II, who proclaimed as perhaps no one before the doctrine of one God of Jews and Christians, while fervently believed in the Mother of God in Jesus Christ. It does not bother the Jews?
S koro believe it or misses it means that Our Lady put on a par with Jesus, so ubóstwił. Fortunately, the editor Pacewicz was the last fair, which this finger pogrozi odszczepieńcom Catholics. Not threatened. Proving that knows more about Christian values \u200b\u200bthan the sanctified its ideology Pacewicz.
N editor and happiness in the end managed to squeeze out of the rabbi a 'negative' a note - it turned out that the concept of the messiah in the execution of Christian and Jews do not overlap. Jesus in terms of the Jewish messiah could not be, because there have been two world wars and then the Holocaust cities time of prosperity and happiness. It is a small fragment of the full interview in which Rabbi Michael Schudrich stands as open to the other side, a balanced and intellectually honest representative of another religion. What did the editor Pacewicz? Sentence:
According to Christians, Jesus meets the definition of messiah, according to the Jews. The twentieth century is the two world wars, the Holocaust. It's obvious that he did not succeed. Interview with Michael Schudrich, chief rabbi of Polish
kicked in the same top, promising, and they suggest the climate history. Reliability, and specifically to congratulate sense of tolerance.
ps
J est and the grating. In total, comprehensible, which does not change the fact that the rabbi the following quote is incorrect:
- Between Judaism and Christianity there is no symmetry. Jesus was a Jew. Of course, then made another great religion, but its roots are in Judaism. And in that sense if you recognize Christianity, Judaism, I know, not otherwise understand. And not vice versa, because we do not have Christian roots. And if it is a religion that wants to know my religion, and admits that my religion is its roots, it is my duty to open the door and help in this.
S ymetria as possible there. Rabbinic Judaism, contrary to the assurances of Mr. Schudrichema is chronologically later than Christianity. It originated as a response to them and remained in close opposition to Christianity. If it were not followers of Jesus, Judaism, which began after the fall of the temple, would be qualitatively very different than today. Without knowledge of Christianity, the Jews will not be able to fully understand this present Judaism. Symmetry
the concerns of biblical Judaism - that it grows out of both rabbinic Judaism and Christianity.
With auważył been a long time, John Paul II said: "You are our dearly beloved brothers and in some ways, you might say, our elder brothers." In the media, but these sentences have already made a career without the words "in some way, you would say" what apparently did not fit the canons of political correctness.
0 comments:
Post a Comment