J Akos so there is always that the Christmas holidays in the press there is a rash of articles about the person of Jesus Christ . There are always the same articles, which appeared a year earlier, mostly upgrades of a few novelties, too stale, but be controversial. While the creator of Christianity in the media is dosed seasonally, the forums of various kinds of ointment in the best blooms all year round.
argument in the discussions served to mostly anticlerical taste (not atheist, contrary imaginations of many), but with pretensions to being scientific.
N and despite the intentions of the critics that there was a historical Christ, the research methodology we apply, but apparently hold the water. Upon closer zabełtaniu it, hovering over the area begins fetorek unpleasant, and the whole swarm of flies hovering. Such is the fate together.
Wdepnijmy her and us:
can not, according to critics, regarded as evidence for the existence of Jesus because:
first The New Testament is unreliable, because the brim filled with tales of miracles.
second The new testament is incredible, because it is inconsistent with current knowledge of history.
third New Testament and Christian literature is unreliable, because written for themselves, "from their point of view"
4th Pagan sources do not count because it created "a few dozen / hundred" years after the events, like the Christian documents.
Beautifully . Clear. Legibly. Let's play now and us apply these criteria to inszych events, with a smaller ratio of ideological colors.
T a can, something obvious, can Congress of Gniezno ? This is where Otto III came to the tomb and relics of St zamęczonego. Wojcecha, (supposedly) secular crowned Boleslaw was appointed Archbishop of Gniezno (administered by the brother martyr Gaudentego), the bishopric in Kołobrzeg, Krakow, Wroclaw. It is on the Bishop of Poznan Unger brought opposition canonical. So much in a nutshell.
main sources here are: Polish Chronicle of Gallus Anonymus, the Chronicle Thietmar Mersenburga, Yearbooks Hildesheimskie. Without them we would not know anything.
What we know from these sources:
Polish Chronicle Gall Anonim: founded more than a century later the events described, is a hymn of praise in honor of Casimir Krzywoustego Brave and Bob (who is a model for Anonymous benefactor ), is ideologically dependent. Unfortunately we have only three of her manuscripts, which is the oldest comes only from the fourteenth century do not meet the points 3 and 4 There also meets a point, because Gall draws a lot of joy in describing the wonders (and this miraculous multiplication of pig, and a spectral knights) and anegdotkach, cites conversations at which he could not be, the whole reads like a fable, not a chronicle of our point view. So? Into the trash!)
Thietmar Chronicle: Mersenburga as a modern Bishop Brave seems to be a worthy source. However, we must stick to our criteria, and fairly marked by its hostility to the Poles (which is true to the ear of Henry II), which may push him to conceal, indeed manipulate the facts. And we view as the holders of the scientific and programmatic skeptical - do not trust and węszymy trick. So - falls under section 3 (ideological dependence.) However, it completely negates the point 1, the Chronicle is a directory of the most bizarre and outlandish situations paranormal miracle of miracles, where the bishop likes spisywaniu. Many times it is mistaken, and writes a simple untruth (as a good example in the book makes up power, saying that it was Emperor Henry I). So - point 2 Not only that, fabulist, it's still kłamczuszek:)
Annals Hildesheimskie: of 1000, so we are interested in relate to the period (such Gall Anonim totally not interested in dates). Just what were they powypisywali!? Archbishopric of Gniezno not only in Prague, the initiative does not Boleslaw the Brave Boleslaw only Czech! Well, since we rejected the previous source, it behooves accept these (the anger foolish historians, who apart from a few exceptions such as Frieda and Wasilewski, accept and Thietmar versions Anonymous). But do not lose heart! Annals of these, it is late compilation, extract from a lost original from the year before the 1065th Besides the numerous interpolacjami. And so the text manipulated. We would like the source of relief and throw into the trash.
And what are we left with the Congress of Gniezno after the criteria that we used previously to the work of Christian, Jewish and pagan concern ing the historical Christ? Well, nothing:)
congratulate and welcome the cruel fact that this methodology is not widely accepted, because there is nothing we would not know the truth about his past:)
In sum, it is interesting denial of the existence of Jesus. Even leading anticlerical Deschner, with pain, but admits rystusa Ch. Co mine to reject that fashion existed in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, promoted by some (inferior) theologians, froze in the 20s Currently, the twentieth century, as theologians, only one known (as claimed by Deschner) insists on the name of this thesis. Of course, we will be more Marxist historiography, but it eventually ceased to insist that Christ did not exist, there lived, not taught, and generally a patchwork of Christian keypads (Jaczynowska confirms this.)
But the museum, it seems, remains in pretty good:)
0 comments:
Post a Comment