How To Make Elementary Salutatory Address

CITY SUPER BROS. - Party


























SUPER CITY BROS. PARTY

W przestrzeń ingerować Bede Rafał Czajka, Jacek Walesiak oraz gentlemen from the collective massmix this great DJ's (Stickorama, D'Art, Psykick, Sufi, Multi, [v] opoor additional visualizations using the material that we took during the project Bros. Super City, prepared by the same Sergei Rafal Kaminski

Rafal Czajka
Rafal Czajka work is anti-aesthetic experiment, as rarely successful. He deliberately seeking to deny the pop culture canon of beauty, yet avoids the banal ugliness epatowania or provocative subject.

In the land of pastel colors and soft forms of subtle scent rises bodily decay of beauty . Sensual Body rakowacieją suddenly, dissolve, crawling with these furry animal biological decomposition. Or overwhelms them tarry blot negation.

work Lapwings are like pack of bitter sweets - they attract a nice exterior, so that for a moment confound the form of irony, black humor, or verbal comment. Treated the same way are images of music idols - like nieudaczne portraits sent by fans of the stars, as if involuntarily, under the guise of aesthetics laurkowej, unmask hidden aberrations. At the same time it is difficult to accuse the artist of a total negation and disgust around him, seen him for a reasonable distance to the masks and appearances. Instead of a balloon pump bodily drama, it will pierce the sting of humor and defiance.

http://www.rafalczajka.com/


Jacek Walesiak
Born in 1987 in Warsaw. Student Graphics Department at the Warsaw Academy of Fine Arts. Works in graphic design,
illustration, collage, photography. A member of the project
KLRFN - klrfn.pl

http://jacekwalesiak.com/


massmix Lab
massmix based on commonly supplemented by a group of artists, graphic bank samples. samples are a common good, everyone has the right to exploit them as part of the group. Based on this collective resource produced by embodiments of the components used. depending on the scale of these are cut in the foil vlepki or template modules. massmix group of them realizes from a kit his improvised compositions. Sometimes, well-balanced and consistent, sometimes crippled and helpless, always unpredictable and surprising ourselves.

http://massmix.bzzz.net/

bits will be serving Fat:
Stickorama - d'n'b, electro
D'Art - breakz, Headz, hopjazzhip, downtempo
Psykick / SubLevel 2 - dubstep, techstep, grime
Sufi / SubLevel2 - beatbox, MC, dubstep, d'n'b
Multi - dubstep, d'n'b, electro
[v]opoor - gangsta rap, ghetto dance, electrotrash


tax: 10 pln
start: 20

http://supercitybros.blogspot.com/

Html Crossword Maker Mac Free

Nano-rafka: Building a DIY cover

Today I present my dubious effect dexterity:) All images, unfortunately, made a cell: (you must forgive me, but I'm not out anything better. Normally, could use a sponsor of the cameras: D

To make the cover I used a white foamed PVC 3mm. I could not afford the small thickness of the material, because the cover was supposed to be tiny, hence resistant to warping caused by the weight of the lighting. To help I bought a plastic square, plain adhesive for bonding cyano-acrylate (a blob) and the cutting blade has provided a wallpaper.

First I cut out and glued a small enclosure for lighting. I invented myself, it will be a "lamp" smaller than the fish tank, large enough to accommodate power-Compacta and which will be "hanging" over the aquarium. Dimensions are 30x20x5cm (the aquarium is 40x25x25). I secretly hope that thanks to the fact that the aquarium will be partly exposed, avoid problems with the high temperature caused by heating the tubes. Of course, something for something - perhaps I'll have to think about automatic refilling evaporated water.

That looks like from the outside. Parts of the same docinałem knife and I warn you that hard to make it perfectly flush. And make it look really cool, it must be równiuteńko.

And so from the inside. Here you can see what a handy plastic kątowniczek.

Then it came time to mount the light in the lid. As you can see the faint image below, I used to run the two fluorescent different ballasts. To run a 11W compact fluorescent lamp cap G23 used the conventional (heavy) ballast 13W, because this type of fluorescent starter is already built in, so it is the only option. In turn, the actinic fluorescent 18W 2G11 shank decided to cut costs and used the ballast from used ordinary fluorescent lamps (light bulbs) shank e14 compact power 18W. For this handy soldering iron:) For those interested in how to do it, I recommend this excellent article .

also began to wonder (at the time soon!) As the cover at all mounted on the tank. I considered different from the apt lines from the ceiling:) by the different legs and handles. I was still a lot of pvc so I thought to myself that it might try to hide such a cascade filter housing and connect immediately with the lamp. What I have is already on the head, which is why I left the back side of the lamp face, as shown in previous photographs. The cutting and gluing This contraption was a lot of fun, it took me almost all weekend. The end result, unfortunately, is poorly satisfactory. Number of plastic a bit overwhelming to a small aquarium - optically is more plastic than glass, and the equality of edges and joints of tiles leaves much to be desired. Well, but, well, took me so much that the event must remain that way:) In the future, probably think of replacing the lamp into something finished. Maybe I should try even taped a PVC veneer which bit mask edges.

following sample illumination. First, white fluorescent.

Then aktynika.

I call 10000K + aktynika. In the next step I need to glue the background on the posterior wall of the aquarium (I plan to black) and paste something from the center of the lid, because PVC by a thin light shines.

And here an attempt to water, yet sweet :)

to the next:)

Movie That Sticks In Your Mind

Nano-rafka: What do I already have. Nano-reef

using the categories that I created in the previous entry ( "What you need to start ), today I will explain what equipment I was able to already collect for this moment, as well as what else I plan to buy.


first Aquarium
I already have an aquarium! Dimensions are 40x25x25 or 25 liters of standard. Long wondered about the size of the aquarium. Mainly just by these dimensions have not bought cubes Nano-Reef Aquael (and black silicone). In my opinion, the bottom surface of 30x30 gives a much less able to arrange than the size of my aquarium, although aquaelowski set is 6 liters of storage volume. Although it was only when buy a rock it is, whether in the case of such small aquariums in general, you can manipulate the term "arrangement" ... Now a bit of glass. Following the advice that can be found on the forums my aquarium is made of ordinary float glass, because apparently the thin windows (I made 4 mm), does not make sense to invest in a more transparent glass which is opti-white. Well, may itself transparency of the glass with the thickness probably is not visible, however the same connection are clearly greenish glass, which probably would not be in glass OW. Let me add that I ordered a clear silicone aquarium glued, because that is my opinion estetyczniejsze. Maybe when black silicone green glass edges were not visible and if indeed there was no opti make sense to insert money. Fortunately, it appears that when turned on the light blue sea, the color of the edge to be visible anymore:) I'm also curious if the check is (hopefully not) a legend that allegedly under the transparent edges after time had pass on algae. In conclusion, I am happy with the choice, the more that the cost of such a reservoir are negligible.

2 and 3 Filtration and circulation

Here fucked hard with rafki Aquael:) cascade filter FZN3 seems to me to be a good idea - it's the flow of 1,200 liters of water per hour. Unfortunately, limited regulation of the water current direction, so probably I'll have to arrange for the circulation of corals and coral do not circulate to how it should be the case. Still, I am hopeful, because through this filter I in one fell swoop rather impressive panel where I can bury a bit of stuff (a heater), which normally would have to be on display in the aquarium and take valuable cm3. Unfortunately, I gave the body a little bit, because by cutting costs, I bought a stimulant and, unfortunately, a bit loud it: / but I have a naive hope that with time it gets ... As for filtration, then I'm going to base it solely on live rock, or I'll put an adjuvant in the form of NO3 and PO4 absorbers, which are available on the market, but it is only in the event of evident problems. I assume that the start- morszczaki who usually nadzianymi and impatient individuals who want to quickly beautiful aquarium in the living room, what they saw out there (sorry for the stereotype, but this is so: P), is cutting the cash register at every step of the trickery and magic to various gadgets that to rapidly change their tank in a beautiful reef. However, I believe that the use of such growth mediums at all times be interference in stabilizing itself and slowly mini-ecosystem, and even though apparently short-term help, and, sooner or later it will affect zbiorniczkowi proverbial hiccups:) This is my theory, but if true - take a look for yourself.

4th Lighting.

1 x compact fluorescent Narva 18W/Blue2 2G11 (blue - actinic)
1 x compact fluorescent Narva 11W/860 G23 (white - 10000K)
For this you need accessories or ballasts, sockets and reflectors.

After activating it turned out that it is very much light as the such a small aquarium, but it is only human in my mind:) Let's see if my mind will share future inhabitants of the aquarium.

recommend to purchase lighting http://www.aqva-light.pl shop, you really do not know what the Polish aquarist would do without him. When you search for the right light for my aquarium, I conclude that the choice of the market is tragic. The choice of lighting it was a veritable torture and, unfortunately, with such small-scale aquarium in the end it turns out that he really had no choice. One should take the smallest fluorescent lamp Narva and apply yourself, because there is simply no alternative. That is to say an alternative would be found, but certainly not the my pocket. Personally, I hope that Aquael put your lights as soon as possible with their Nano-Reef to be sold as a separate item and will probably be one of the first customers. The point is that yes, you can make yourself a glass of cool, but it must be able to. I came out medium (

fifth water.

I so lucky that I have a friend with a filter, reverse osmosis (RO). I'm going to occasionally "borrow" from him a few literków for replacements. I'll think about buying more Filter the resin (DI). For salinity ordered Instant Ocean salt. For the time being 4 kg. I think that to start the aquarium salt should be the least rich in all the extras. This apparently is so, so I think that at the beginning will be like found. When worn it to see if something will need to sprinkle a better quality.

And for now:)

And, unfortunately, will soon show its porażkową lamp DIY!

Cake Ideas For Lymphoma

The seven mountains, the seven woods

J ak is widely known, press releases, atheism today knows and does not believe. We also know that it is cooler than any theism, because to him the way of science. He knows the difference between a potential energy, the kinetic effects that unifies the standard model, as the theory of evolution called the common apomorphine. True, it is obvious to any militant, armed with a scientific worldview, an atheist? Crudely-media and anti-clerical, as opposed to the conscious, atheism is disgusted with the information and unproven to be believed. This domain of theists, a sheep with the brains of fantasies and fables przeoranymi the flying teapot. This differs from zindoktrynowanych believe that his knowledge is scientific, verified, validated and methodologically. O-current-k-ty-wna! No dogma.

In e too, that science has always been in conflict with faith, which can serve a ball from the hand of many examples. And this knowledge presented a shocking article about the founder of Hawking's confession that God is not stated in the Newsweek Fri Excess God. When the shock has passed, and the dyspnea resolved, crushed the reader can expand his horizons with a separate section of the main text, in the form of frames, entitled not believe . It presents a brief history of the oppressed of science, which is in constant conflict with faith.

worth a closer look, because in some cases a collection of classic allegations of militant atheism, and this, as already mentioned, he abhors the dogma, does not give anything to be believed and is not based on non-scientific fencing and defamation.

1600. Dies at the stake of Giordano Bruno - philosopher and scientist considered a heretic. Proclaims the Copernicus that the earth revolves around the sun rather than vice versa, but also goes a step further. Contrary to the beliefs and doctrine of the Church the Polish astronomer believes that the universe is infinite. Also claims that Jesus was a man, not God.

K elephant with a row plus a sugar cube for the person who provides any scientific work Bruno. Any treaty methodologically consistent with the values \u200b\u200bon which modern science was founded. The fact that Bruno was a scientist, working in pop culture as a clear evidence and entered the vocabulary of modern intellectual. And while we have entered and anointed with the scientific worldview, it is already excluded from the definition of all mental processes, which unnecessarily encumber valuable, because not marred by religious fantasies, mind (it's not malice - it's a verbatim quote of the holder of that reason.)

K hen Giordano Bruno in the tour moves across Europe, the emerging life sciences have had their representatives in the persons of Copernicus, Brach, Kepler, and Galileo. Although not entirely liberated from the mental conditions of his time (As a matter of fact came after Newton's death), are treated on the founders of modern style of doing science.
The success of their research, which eventually plunged the Aristotelian way of looking at reality, decided by the initial assumptions.

most important is the recognition mathematicity nature, understood as the ability of its mathematical description. This is another step by grasping the rationality of what they did long before Copernicus (for example, a model universe consisting of the world over and podksiężycowego, with its seven spheres was a logical and consistent "everyday experiences").

There has been a revolutionary shift from descriptive models, based on quality, the mathematical model - quantitative. Mathematical model in contrast to the qualitative began to "count", instead of describing, he began to "act" giving a prediction, rather than artificially adjust to the next observation. Mathematics became the founder of a scientific revolution. In conjunction with the observation of nature, and gave mankind a powerful weapon and resulted in an unprecedented technological leap.

A perceive mathematics as a scientist Bruno Jordan? What's your view of reality based? Certainly not on mathematics. Did not accept this fact and denied her any value! The work La valuable delle CENER and explicitly states that he has a bad Copernicus, that the cities to philosophize on the nature, plays in mathematics, following in the footsteps of Ptolemy, Hipparchus and Eudoxus. His distaste associated with mathematics resulted from the adoption of ontologies. He expressed the three treaties cosmology: De l'infinito universo e mondi , De la causa principio , e uno and wspomianych price. sketches a vision of where the "new philosophy, specifically neo-Platonic, which is absolutely infinite (" the whole infinite "and" absolutely infinite ") God, by virtue of its qualities is not in any relation to the material world. And since they are left with is an infinite world of being a "shadow of God" is not to embrace the tools of the finite human intellect. The only thing he is is an attempt to overwhelming reason speculative metaphysical intellect by which we learn of "substance" and "the nature of things." We do this either by innate ideas, or by syllogisms contained in the original premise. So we recognize the "physical matter" and "matter disembodied, we understand that the earth has a sensual and rational soul, we realize that the planets are the angels, and that there is reincarnation, and the observation of the senses and not too much for us to pass," since infinity can not be the object of sensory perception "( De l'infinito ... ).

If that reasoning, do not associate much with my colleagues - scientists such as Kepler Bruno, who, through the tedious mathematical calculations, rejects "the souls of the planets," replacing them with solar magnetism and elliptical orbits, it's good not to associate.

K oil important value on which modern science was based on this assumption idealization, approximation, simplification, isolation of certain structures, for the purpose of modeling. And humanly speaking - does not take to grips with the world in all its complexity, because we follow the path of Aristotle - the scientific aspect is subordinated to the "top-down philosophical system. And all will fall under the weight of physicality wish it all together (were favorable susceptible to modification of the rules of his system of philosophical terms such as potentiality, matter and form, the four elements, the doctrine of natural place, etc).
We follow a different path - starting from the maximum simplification fragment of reality to fit the problem to the method, not a problem for philosophy (Newton).

J ak is the assumption that Bruno academic achievements? Nohow. And specifically - exactly the opposite. As the creator of the "new philosophy", restorer of "secret", "initiation", "magic" of knowledge, giving him authority over the people, appears as a "magician-philosopher" using "key physiognomic" ( Cantus circeus ) "'angel of light" sent by the gods to restore the ancient wisdom to' restore 'youth of the world, tying a knot in the' right ',' truth ', religion, politics and philosophy "( Dialoghi italiani ). Methodologically continues the best traditions of magical divination Gnostic and Egyptian, and the foundation of values \u200b\u200bupon which modern science is born - contests. His system has the same disadvantages as the outgoing Aristotelianism - it is purely qualitative, speculative and abstract, nohow falsifiable.

Science in the execution of Bruno would be a dreary negation, technically, would hold up in the seventeenth century, the central character Bruno - Messiah and the final donor law. No text messages, mejli, computers, only pigeons postal carriages, dirt and diseases treated by Gnostic rites of prayers zanoszonymi to matter "universal" with the creative force of change.

S kad therefore these odium of science in the works of Bruno? Tells us is the author of the statement - "says the Copernicus that the earth revolves around the Sun" and "that the universe is infinite."
If this argument is to provide the scientific method, that brings us to an otherwise fascinating conclusions. For example, the evolution of each of today's fan is automatically a scientist. Simply. Does not need to understand, and what fun - maybe kontestować, like Bruno, the scientific tools (do not accept the math and genetics). Just that verbally for her to tell. And voila - now falls to him to look for an academic.
Such reasoning is accompanied przypinaniu patches scientist Giordano Bruno. Bruno takes the Copernican theory, not because they understood the mathematical brilliance (his copy About Revolution ... briskly signed but did not carry any trace of use marginaliów example, typical of the readers). Nor that it was confirmed empirically. As a critic of mathematicians, justifying the theory of absolutely do not care. Treats it purely instrumental - the traffic circulation and the Earth's rotation he fits perfectly to his philosophy of continuous change of matter ( La price ....) To the atomism, which he confessed.
And that's it.

Bruno is not a proponent of scientific heliocentrism - is its Gnostic and magical fanboy. Without substantive knowledge and without any claim to prove it.

Another element - "infinity of the universe" - Is the same. Infinity stemmed not from the scientific aspirations of Bruno, it's not mathematical infinity, but the magical-hermetic. Pure coincidence verbal word "indefinitely" in modern astronomy and the myths Bruno testifies not about scientific connotations of our magician, but the ignorance of people who are science it on a pedestal.
more that Giordano Bruno was not the first who introduced to cosmology, the term "currently in the infinite universe." He was John Major (d. 1550) and later Thomas Digges. What differs them from Bruno, the fact that they were not antyklerykałami and died at the stake. So they were boring.

Being a consistent believer in purely verbal convergence, it is now given scientific status in the history of the Catholic Church, which disagreed with Bruno, that the heavenly bodies are the angels, or the intelligence of the Earth, appears to be the guardian of the concerned scientific truths .

tussle with the information in the quoted passage zaserwowanej may also suggest that the scientific ideas of Giordano Bruno was hailed as a heretic. Nothing could be more wrong. Of the eight complaints (ie censorship), which were presented to him from 1599 r, six regarding theological and philosophical issues (the other is the motion of the Earth and the infinity of the universe). Giordano Bruno was a Dominican and a staunch anticlerical trial was too dangerous for the views of the then status quo, from which part of the cosmological (as mentioned above - specifically and not scientifically understood) was secondary.
course anyone sentenced to death for the views is shameful and deplorable. But tuning in pen humanist and completely ignores the mentality moralizer of those times where faith was a bulwark of the rule of law, sanction power, and social justice. Just like today, democracy - for violations of democratic values \u200b\u200bsuch as human freedom, tolerance, civil rights goes to prison. In the Middle Ages, with its different hierarchy of values \u200b\u200band a brutal secular judiciary (courts inquisitorial to him not umywały) - you could lose your life. It is worth remembering, when studying the history of some of the facts omits a full understanding silence, and the other holy cause outrage Moral and shortness of breath.

In flow on contemporary Giordano Bruno was low. Mersenne, one of the initiators of scientific exchanges with the seventeenth century, struck out with its list of scientists, not appreciated it very French Encyclopaedists. Gained fame only in the nineteenth century, the wave of anticlerical speaking and Italian aspirations for independence.
course can be regarded as a visionary, you can admire his fortitude and steadfastness in the face of death. But it should also win with a bit of scientific objectivity and admit that a scientist was none. His teaching is a combination of divination, gnosis and neo-Platonism. If not for his tragic death at the stake, would share the fate of a lot of his peers, which in those days there was no shortage. He would have been simply forgotten.

1616. Congregation of the Inquisition, Cardinal entered in the "Index of prohibited books" On the Revolutions of Heavenly Spheres "Nicolaus Copernicus. The work shall be deemed to be heretical, though at first the Church of a book published in 1543 does not comment officially.

About Revolutions of Heavenly Spheres has not been considered heretical. Never. This is another "obvious truth" and as "a scientist Bruno," or "flat Earth in średniowiowieczu" functioned as the equivalent of levitation teapot atheists. Although a vague equivalent, in many similar cases, at least half levitates household appliances.

Typing of the item on the index, the common perception, most often associated with the crowd zaślinionej hate fat, burning books, including the author, clandestine, where participants, carrying the torch of progress, risking their lives to give, somewhere in zakonspirowanej, secret cave, Batman, spiritualized reading. And merely reading banned, condemned, absolutely not acceptable to the jealous of their influence of the clergy. So much for the fairy tale.

work of Copernicus, appearing on the list did not receive either clause Damnata (condemned) or Prohibit (forbidden). Intentionally or (of which enjoyed the Galileo in his letters) has not been called a heretic, as many wanted to contemporary. Received the third clause-s uspensum donec corrigatur , which meant "the suspension until the introduction of amendments." Amendments related to the deletion of sentences, which presented heliocentrism as fact rather than theory. Changes are not introduced inkwizytorska secret police, which flowed at 6 am, that "no one does not expect", introduced them to the holders of books themselves. They took the pen and gently, like Galileo, so as not to obliterate kreślonego text - put up a stroke on a few sentences. The fact that some do not want and no one could force them to be wanted. Such a Galileo, for this example, we'd like. His many buddies from Italy - just (about ⅔ of the accounts). But the rest of the Western world completely ignored the recommendation, regarding them as an internal affair of the Italian. I do not mean that a Protestant country - in Catholic countries such as Spain, and France has been found virtually no revised book About Revolution ... What is more, and the wickedness of many mitomanom, English (This is the worst possible - the English Inquisition) version of the Index, explicitly allows for the use of the work of Copernicus! Stacks are not burned. Wywlekania majtach people in the market, nor uświadczono.
"On the Revolutions of Heavenly Spheres" discharged from the Index on .... 1620, four years after its type. On the Index remained unamended version.

Anticipating objections - the above argument does not attempt apology for the Church, his interference was evident. But in light of contemporary knowledge, the dominant philosophical paradigm, emerging only the natural sciences, culture funcjonującego authority at that time, the opposition, put down the Aristotelian-Thomistic lobby, the Reformation - it does not seem to be any realistic alternative. Do not change the fact that writing a heresy of Copernicus, it's still a pop culture Bajania, create reality, rather than a reliable reconstruction.

1633. For life is sentenced to house arrest by the Inquisition Italian astronomer Galileo for the publication of "Dialogue and the two major systems of the world - and kopernikowym ptolemeuszowym, supporting the heliocentric view of the world. His work goes to the "Index of prohibited books" from which is removed only in 1835.

T obvious example of strength to use the authority of the Church. Galileo sentenced to a canonical (recitation of psalms week 7, which then refuses to be his daughter), living first in the gardens of Tuscany embassy in Rome, then at the residence of his friend Archbishop Piccolomini and his own villa. It creates more and it seems, although his work is Copernican inhibited for obvious reasons. As for the elimination of its Dialogue - does not appear in the new edition of the Index from 1835 r, but officially his work, with the approval of the Church, is issued (effort printer seminar Padua) 1744, already - but bear the corresponding annotation.

K oil painting event, according to the author's statement, is the emergence of Darwin and his theory of evolution. Ferment which was then, according to the text, another example of tensions between the science - religion. We go over the agenda. Interesting and presents the next event:

1925. Before the Tennessee state court is 24-year-old teacher John Scopes, accused of illegal teaching of evolutionary theory. (...) The Defender asked the prosecutor, among others here is where Cain took a wife, since the only woman in the world was Eve. This was to demonstrate the inconsistency of religious point of view, (...).

C iekawym author's treatment is to show the conflict of science - religion at the level of criticism of the Bible - science. In other words, every critic of the Bible, automatically become the representative of science and should be immortalized in the statement which deals with clashes between science and religion. The problem is superficial (that is, and how awful - unscientific) approach the issue - the alleged "inconsistency of a religious point of view" is just an inconsistency arising from ignornacji of criticizing the Bible's teachings. The thing is perfectly clarified, inconsistencies no, thanks to the development of science. This passage should therefore be included within the tension between science and the scientific dilettantes.

course there is the problem of a judicial ruling on the veracity of scientific theories. But this is not an issue of science and religion, but science and concepts of functioning and effectiveness of the state, which allows you to confuse the natural sciences, the ideologies, the legal confusion, the public, with elements of the outlook and privacy. This applies not only religion, but the various sorts of other issues, ideology, political concepts, etc., which are likely to proceed the broad waters of public discourse whenever the permit is unsealed, vague framework for the functioning of the state.

N The next example cited in the article refers to the former - an indication of Freud, which calls for the abandonment of "harmful illusion of religion" and replacing it with "the image of the mind caught up in desires, fears and traumas." This is a classic confusion of levels, personal views on metaphysics, with the authority of science, which by definition is not metaphysics. And again, as before, Freud is a scientific fact has been anointed as his act of criticism religion.

1960. British scientist Francis Circk (...) considers itself an agnostic, takes a job at Churchill College, Cambridge, provided that there will not be built chapel. Several years later, the university authorities affect donation intended for the construction of the chapel (...). Crick resigns.

P rzypominam - the thing is about the mutual tension between religion and science, and yet again serves up the tension between science and one's worldview. Scheme is simple - Mr. Crick did not agree to the chapel, because it reconciles apparently, in his view, the authority of science. As a scientist and does not agree, it will automatically science itself, which is a representative, disagrees. And we have another conflict and another point in the religion versus science wyliczance.
And another example of ideological understanding of science, which is wrong (objectively) the result of research with its interpretation in the framework of one's (subjective) beliefs. If you Crick'owi sphere does not correspond to the sacred, it does not mean anything else that he does not respond. The existence of the chapel does nothing affects the methodology of scientific research. As a symbol, but affects the realm of beliefs on faith, or unbelief. The joke lies in the fact that science has not only failed to assess the validity of these specific issues of metaphysical, AT ALL, it does not see the problem. In its methodology, it does not exist. Instead, there is a belief. And there are scores of publications erroneous assessment of the scientific worldview.

Is the author an example served to the researcher, who bet that the chapel does not interfere, and indeed przeciwinie - happy, means that science supports religion? Well no, probably responsible, are two separate issues. And good answers. So why such opposite serves as an argument conflict, since it no longer serves a counter-argument, or thesis is the reverse? What is the value of an argument with someone else's worldview, which by definition contains unscientific, untestable, unverifiable, because based on metaphysics, ontology, and epistemological issues, based on a principle of faith? Agnosticism Mr Crick is subject to scientific validation?

U tożsamianie worldview of the researcher, the same methodology of natural science is a misuse and misunderstanding of the grounds on which it is founded. This misunderstanding is making itself felt whenever such attempts to people to push that to have a scientific worldview and accept the theory of evolution, one must be an atheist, or, ultimately, an agnostic.

T misunderstanding that echoes the last point regarding the issue of an imaginary God Dawkins, in which the author notes that "from the standpoint of science the existence of God is extremely unlikely." Quoted passage is from the standpoint of research methodology is to babble. This is a purely philosophical argument, not scientific, which is added to the authority, suggesting that it is based on scientific considerations. Dawkins is a great popularizer of science, but God Delusion is not a scientific book, but the average quality of allocution affairs of what is Dawkinsowi appears on religion and philosophy. And it seems to him often falsely, because either poorly philosophizes, or, as an intelligent, well aware of these deficiencies, but the "end justifies the means" sincerely believed in his mission, so allow yourself to crude generalizations and mixing levels. Faithful and just to adopt without a murmur and analysis.

with chronicle obligation, it should be noted that a further two points counting the author's concern Templeton Prize and John Paul II's apology for the process of Galileo.

C of us is from the famous introduction in which the author writes that "the coexistence of science and religion only occasionally was a peaceful"? The dispute and the heliocentric theory of Darwin. Statistically very poorly as the 400 years of modern science. The rest is a combination of pop culture myths and misunderstanding of the idea of \u200b\u200bscience.
better that the author went out, and even volume would utuczył if he as a tension between science and ideologies - such as the Bolshevik, or National Socialism. Broad scope for the war as it looks, numerous victims, the persecution of unparalleled size AIW tępionych theories can pick - from physics and cosmology, genetics, economics, and linguistics. Only if it is not very trendy, uninteresting by definition, is not it?

How To Wire Apline Type R

: What you need to start?

To replace the tank and start the adventure right from the disaster must meet at least the minimum requirements posed before us this project.

Long ago I wrote about equipment necessary to run an average freshwater . I must admit that I do not like to write about such grounds - it is just boring:) but anyway I think the more we write about it wherever you can, the less mistakes will commit a beginner aquarist, and thus fewer animals will suffer by it, and even our pockets as well. Therefore, I also from time to time wyskrobię some platitudes.


This time I write, what will be needed in setting up marine aquarium in the mini version and why . It will be obvious to the experienced self-evident "morszczaków", but beginners should find here some useful information. Mark at this point I have, that he never owned a saltwater aquarium, and all derive their knowledge from the Internet. Of course, as with everything on the internet and on the marine aquarium there are a hundred different theories for each of the issues. The worst part is that most everyone is sure of, and each theory is sensible. We are not themselves able to say one hundred per cent who is right and who is not, so it remains We only select and try on their own skin, but rather their own aquarium.

read dozens of pages of texts and discussion sites and forums you can get mad. Most people are urged to stick with the generally accepted rules, and after a while there is a person who has the weight of these rules broken, and its reservoir even though it has been great. This prompts reflection on the meaningfulness of this whole great quantities of expensive gadgets and a variety of preparations available on the market. So I decided to draw their own conclusions and from a healthy distance to approach the councils of other aquarists and fashion trend at the moment. So pick up the only thing that seems to me to be interesting and meaningful, and what I would like to apply, or try it in your next aquarium morskim.T over the same reserve that this cycle of my "articles" would not say how you should lead your aquarium, only How I'm going to do it I . Will I succeed or fail, it will show time:)

basic requirements of the marine basin divide into several categories to make it easier to comprehend it all. In this post I will not dwell on the details - it will be only those generalities, with which I will try to draw a beginner aquarist, "what is it." I describe everything in more detail in future texts, because I want each of the following categories in a separate, larger article. If I find time!

first Aquarium - so as to set up a marine tank aquarium will also need:) If we are not in it to hold the fish and larger creatures of a higher sea anemones, large starfish, etc., is an aquarium can be very small. But we must remember, by corals, which we buy in the future were also selected to the head, that is, according to their preferences and requirements. To this end, before we buy something pretty and colorful, read about it first. For example, on this site .

second Filtration - of course there is here a standard division of the biological filtration (ie mainly nitrification and denitrification) and mechanical . However, the biological filtration in a standard aquarium is divided into more (przynajmniej!) in two ways. Firstly, there is a by any beneficial bacteria and other tiny organisms (On the same basis as in freshwater), which inhabit all possible spaces such as the substrate (sand, gravel), and the interior surface of the rock or bed in the filter. The second filter media is skimmer. It is a device which, in a nutshell, expanded water from our tank and the foam that accumulates in a separate container. In this way, water is removed from the various undesirable substances. The skimmer is needed in a fish tank, as a result of abundant feeding and metabolism of fish pollute the water so much faster. In the case of small aquariums where lack of creatures that require frequent feeding can opt out of the skimmer, which usually is an expensive device. case was the reduction of harmful nitrogen compounds take care of us live rock full of beneficial micro-organisms and the frequent water changes :)

third Circulation - in the aquarium efficient circulation is much more important than it is in an aquarium with fresh water. Oxygenated water washing down corals facilitates their gas exchange, provides food, substances needed and ingredients and washes with the products of metabolism . Circulation It is also a key factor when it comes to biological filtration with live rock, which is full of microscopic organisms that help keep the aquarium in biological stability. In this case, one might therefore move to a single basket circulation with filtration as providing intensive circulation should get us in a small tank in one go is also the issue of biological filtration.

4th lighting - lighting for most of the corals is the prime consideration, because, to the plants, use they (but not all!) phenomenon of photosynthesis that to eat:) The process is slightly different from what we know from biology lessons on the plants, but in this entry I will not go into that. For corals easy (and only those will keep us, the novice aquarist marine) generally requires a strong light as compared to the realities of freshwater, but when it comes to marine standards, it will be as a moderate amount. For the approximately 30-liter aquariums should be sufficient for example, after two fluorescent 11W (watt), making it a total 22w light. Why two and not a lamp, stronger? Because we need two lamps of different colors - one for white light and one specialist - Actinic - a very blue spectrum. And why, you'll learn about it in the entry devoted to the marine aquarium lighting.

5th Water - Water in the aquarium could dwell for hours and parties, so to prevent this, I write what I have to pass in this category as most concisely, otherwise the time just do not overtake:) Well, the water we we pour into our aquarium Marine will have to be a) as clean and b) salty. For this reason, usually need special filter system (RO + DI) , which we will purify the water (or access to clean in every sense of the word water from another source), as well as a special sea salt that the water we - how easy to guess - posoli.

is far behind.

slowly begin to collect hardware, so to you soon:)

Kate Candy Cane Sttripes

Save the Xingu River

Referring to the recent text of the tragic consequences of the plans to build there Amazonian areas, today I put a link to petition under which everyone can sign up, which lies at the heart of the welfare and future of this unique land.

Save the Xingu River

List Of Spectrobes Origins Spectrobes

Grønland

Get Well Messages For Strokes

Polish City Cleaners

On a whim, we cleaned the site of the club Taxi Take Away from the multilayer shell posters. Action has given us much satisfaction. A few hours later, fresh posters appeared in August.

Then we went for a walk and find another place that we believe need of peeling. As a reward, we saw the passage paintings five years ago.

Taking Lorazepam With Benedryl

chu-chu & co. All of fame