D at this time, in moments of dark musings about the shape of the world, short enough to divine litany of Al Gore, to greet the day full of new hope. This should be re-consider the Nobel Prize for climate apostle, as his first gospel already born fruit - this winter the temperature dropped so much that at Some people catch a cold.
P he problem is that our little messiahs pantheon is expanding and will soon another altar trza will probably put in the hall. saviors of the world to join the group of vegetarians. There not some casual vegetarians, who live quietly, and that due to the estimate as another mięsożercom. Vegetarians with a strong sense of mission and conversion. Word - vegetarians enlightened.
P odręcznikowym indeed an example of green gnostic is someone named Jonathan Safran Foer and his work 'eating animals. " These have been presented in the article of modest title "The world will save vegetarians." U.S. writer, in the rush of golden thoughts which summarize the lack of space does not make sense, sets, among other things, the three arguments against eating meat.
(...) consumption of meat on a large scale violation of the fundamental rights of animals which a man condemned to suffering and death.
N ajwyraźniej swollen bellies are trimmed African. They were fashionable two decades ago. Like the massive eruption in the wild fellows around the globe, a not-to-pronounce names. People did not benefit from their fundamental rights, so they are themselves to blame. Animals talk than to complain they can not, therefore, we must now speak up loudly about their fundamental rights.
K elephant with a row of sugar cubes, and those who define these fundamental rights. What is it? And where were these announced? Right to life? Please communicate this pig in a slaughterhouse. The right to freedom? Let Mr. Foer runs from the pocket knife from corral to corral and cut dog collars, puts horses and let them open in the missionary chlewiki rapture. And then the impossible (for their own good, of course) their return, because the wise pets know where they will be the best. This may other fundamental rights - equality before the law? Religious freedom? Freedom of assembly?
Mr. Foer - and you can just about worthy of death, no angulation of animals, and generally giving them a life without suffering? Here you go, this glorious and worthy of imitation, only that they are of positive law. For what wild animals in nature do not suffer, do not push yourself, are not consumed in the near-death pain and horror? Could nature have in the rectum of their fundamental rights?
P he right bastard katującego punishment horse, or dog, not because ontycznie that are equal (have the same fundamental rights) only because the bastard deny their humanity. And for that punishment should be meted out according to the law enacted (different in different places).
anthropomorphization Humanization and animals will lead to what has already been seen in climate oszłomów ubóstwiających nature - from the top, forcing the legal eutanacji and reduce fertility in the name of the struggle for good health pramatki Gai.
This can and attractive value for well-fed, well-being przytępawych and bored teenagers or in crisis middle age, but not for the hard-nosed realists. This measure with real problems.
( ...) industrial farming leads to a degradation of the environment - Animal excreta contaminate the ground water, tropical forests are cleared of cattle, and to get into the atmosphere huge amounts of methane emitted by cattle and accelerate global warming. (...)
In elcome therefore postmięsnym militant wegetarian.Założmy paradise, a vast majority Earth's population is vegetarian (even vegan).
Since 2 / 3 the world is not suitable for growing and rapidly declining demand for meat, begin exodus from the countryside to the cities. Farmers sell land to investors en masse, and thus decreases the amount of food produced.
emerging monoculture of cereals and legumes, which inevitably leads to sterilization, and soil erosion. Those rescued are artificial fertilizers which produce one tonne need three tons of crude oil - Mr. Foer, you understand that Al Gore could be that you dislike? Some countries have meanwhile become aware that an investment such as the rice is not one of the most successful-their people suffer from malaria en masse (cultivation of rice in the world in 1993 caused 155 million cases of malaria by providing mosquito favorable for their development sites) and flu (contact man with ducks on the same ryżowiskach resulted in 500 million cases of influenza). Cashier
comb pharmaceutical companies and those associated with artificial fertilizers. The European Union, in accordance with the principle of political correctness demands for the sake of niewiadomokogo (ie - you know who and that's not an EU citizen) and top-down mandatory purchase limits of phosphorous, nitrogen, potassium, etc. Machina bureaucratic moves at all now, but energy companies with energy efficient fluorescent szczytującymi, experiencing orgasm mega-corporations that produce chemicals for agriculture. Etc.
N a score of mishap must be regarded as an oversight Mr. Foer, in which he forgot that the forests are cut down not only cattle but also for arable land. Let the madness kindly remind deforestation related to the breeding of plants for biofuels, increased prices and widespread hunger in areas where "the fundamental rights of animals" do not know why, losers of fundamental human rights, fighting for survival. Mr Foer, were you ever really hungry?
Confusion of biofuels is an example of how top-stimulated legally specific crops (which would be witnessed in our ekoraju) led to the economic meltdown and abuse clever farmers who benefited from the politically correct stupid law makers.
M ethane produced agriculture in significant quantities. That's true. But to proclaim that reason the thesis of the passage vegetarianism, it would be, instead of empty generalities, to present arguments which prove that the reduction of cattle stock, reduce the temperature noticeably.
Bo (or maybe I'm not up to date?) Is currently fashionable to accuse a man, not the poor animals. Podzieją where their fundamental rights, when it starts to artificially reduce their population? Where will their freedom of assembly, a dignified life, the right to have children? Mr Foer?
N e is common knowledge that the best system is a mixed farming, where the cultivation perfectly complements the growing inventory (for example, chickens running around the garden pests eat the insect and also provide high-quality eggs, sheep grazing in orchards eliminate the need for herbicides, and grazing in the groves and other areas of marginal importance cows deliver a full, clean milk, making these lands economically viable for the farmer. "Mixed farming is also healthier for the soil itself, which will give rise to increased yields, if it is treated in accordance with traditional principles of cultivation.").
(...) poor quality of many of the species has a negative impact on human health.
P odobnie how bad the quality of vegetable chow. Neither is new. And no finding that the latter is more often chemically enhanced. A and will be persuasive evidence that a pure vegetarian diet adversely affects the development of young people. Arguments can be flip, but why?
So much for the argument Jonathan Safran Foer converted. At the end gem illustrating titanic mental processes occurring in the happily liberated from the meat of the brain author:
"If people take to heart the suffering of animals, they should refrain from eating eggs, and in the interests of climate avoid eating beef. For the good of the planet would also be beneficial to limit the consumption of marine fish. The decision lies with each of us.
K RASC, match, and the collapse shabbily eggs may not, in fact suffer from this procederze hens (which was a fundamental right in this If broken?). However, the beef kill donors can not, because patience in this climate. Oh, sweet, harmless relativism:) When it comes to limiting consumption of fish I'm giving up - they can also emit too much methane?
The remaining allegations contained a corresponding article, among others. This article, which shamelessly used the "myths of vegetarianism" .
Hm .. What's for dinner?
